Q1. So, in the end, how’d your WP2 paper go? What were you
happy with? What weren’t you? Why? Be specific!
I think in the end my paper went better than I initially expected. Once I found a topic I was interested in, the paper was a lot easier to write. I was happy with my topic and the amount of evidence I was able to use and information I was able to cover from the three articles. I found it pretty hard to limit myself and decide which information was more important to talk about because I felt that the assignment was so broad and there was so much that I could discuss.
Q2. Which 2 or 3 comments that you received yesterday were the most helpful for you? Why?
A helpful comment I received was about one of the sentences I wrote in my conclusion. It was pointed out to me that it might be more useful to include it in one of my body paragraphs, since it was more along the lines of evidence rather than a key element to my argument. Another helpful comment suggested that I could expand my argument by looking into how bias plays a role in the way the non-academic article was written and how that is different than the scholarly pieces. This was great because it helped me add more analysis to my paper that I had not thought of before.
I think in the end my paper went better than I initially expected. Once I found a topic I was interested in, the paper was a lot easier to write. I was happy with my topic and the amount of evidence I was able to use and information I was able to cover from the three articles. I found it pretty hard to limit myself and decide which information was more important to talk about because I felt that the assignment was so broad and there was so much that I could discuss.
Q2. Which 2 or 3 comments that you received yesterday were the most helpful for you? Why?
A helpful comment I received was about one of the sentences I wrote in my conclusion. It was pointed out to me that it might be more useful to include it in one of my body paragraphs, since it was more along the lines of evidence rather than a key element to my argument. Another helpful comment suggested that I could expand my argument by looking into how bias plays a role in the way the non-academic article was written and how that is different than the scholarly pieces. This was great because it helped me add more analysis to my paper that I had not thought of before.
No comments:
Post a Comment